Erica
Jong is described in a 1975 Time Magazine article, as “a pretty, blonde
woman with an expansive smile.” The author “is giggly and ebullient, sprinkling
her talk alternately with four-letter words and literary allusions.” This description may have been written
thirty-seven years ago, but it is just as apt today. At first, the author appeared guarded, hidden behind her
leather jacket and leopard-print scarf. She even seemed to have a twinge of
condescension in her demeanor. However, this proved to be largely my own
preconceived notions as, minutes into our discussion, she shed this persona
entirely. She peeled off her jacket, removed her scarf and, in the ultimate
transformative moment, removed her enormous sunglasses, appearing at once more
relaxed and amicable.
Right
from the beginning, Erica stood in blatant contrast to the other authors of the semester. With (to quote Jong herself) “dare I say penetrating” humor and
guileless remarks, the author’s candor added new dimension to both her own
novel and the course in general.
Many of the Jewish Lit Live authors have been charming, yet relatively
pensive and introverted. In fact, these characteristics were becoming the
status quo for our author visits. With a refreshing, forthright personality,
Jong obliterated this trend. She spoke with a certain spark. Her sarcasm and
emphatic nature teetered on the brink of hyperbole at times, but Jong
ultimately grounded her statements in (at least some version of) reality.
At
times while reading Fear of Flying, I
had sided with the Times article
which deemed the book “ shapeless” with a “self-indulgent plot” and “too prone
to phrases like ‘our mouths melted like liquid.’” I see now that perhaps Jong’s
exaggerations and elaborate metaphors do not, like the article implies and like
I claimed initially, replace the author’s authenticity. Instead, maybe the
flowery, poetic prose mask the truth and challenge the reader to search a bit
before they find it. This is similar to the way Jong seems to conduct herself;
amidst her one-liners and amusing anecdotes, the author tucked profound
insights and ideas.
When
Pearl Abraham came to visit, she immediately drew a palpable distinction
between herself and the protagonist of The
Romance Reader. This was not the case for the Fear of Flying author. Both Jong and her character Isadora Wing are
intriguing because of their inconsistencies; they have the ability to be
simultaneously sardonic and sweet. Erica, like her protagonist, was a fountain
of information. She bubbled with quotes from authors, book trivia, and
historical facts. While she was open to every type of question, at times she
veered from the subject at hand.
An aside would turn into a story or a simple answer would become a
tangent to a more complex subject matter.
It was in these digressions that the Erica would unveil a gem of wisdom.
Isadora’s confessions mimicked Jong’s responses. Both found their greatest
stories once they swerved from an original path.
Although
our class has been warned repeatedly to avoid categorizing an author and her
protagonist as one in the same, Jong and Wing came as a unit. At times it
seemed like the author had decided to become her book’s protagonist for the
purpose of discussing Fear of Flying.
The truth, however, is that Isadora and Erica actually are, mostly, one in the
same; the lines between them are indelibly blurred. Some authors protest being
compared to the characters they create. Erica embraces it, acknowledging that
the book is "an interweaving of fiction with reality" (Time).
In
the book that Jong openly admits is a “bit of a rant,” Isadora often speaks in
melodramatic tones or confronts the sinister themes in life with wit and a touch
of absurdity. Despite the subject matter, humor saturates the pages of Fear of Flying. Erica’s ability to be
both side-splitting and serious may have been one of the reasons the
mock-memoir had such success. It reads as both a ground-breaking and important
novel which altered the feminist movement and a comic guilty pleasure. The reason for this dichotomy is
simple; Jong explained that “humor makes the medicine go down.” It allows us to
addresses the harsh realities of the world in a way we can stomach. Fear of Flying gives women a way to
approach taboo subjects. The important thing, Erica explained, is that when
people laugh at the book, “they laugh at it with recognition.”
During
the evening event, Erica described her growth as a writer but noted that the
main themes in her work have stayed the same from her college years to today.
When she read her story Kiss from the
Sugar in My Bowl short story
anthology, this became immediately apparent. With the same intimate tone seen
in Fear of Flying, Jong once again
confronted femininity and what the author called the “psychological games that we play with ourselves and with
each other.” She harkened back to the idea of the “zipless fuck,” expressing
one woman’s desire to have sex without having to deal with the emotional
repercussions. Sex, fear, passion
and inner turmoil, were just as pervasive in Kiss as they had been in her work three decades earlier.
While
her advice to budding writers was in many ways similar to the tried and true
advice we’ve heard before, her methods were also unique and innovative. When
Jong described her work on her current book, she said that at times when she
was writing she thought it might be a memoir. At other times she said it seemed
like fiction. Sometimes, she believed it would be another Isadora Wing
installment. This spoke volumes about Jong’s ability to make fiction and the
real world interact. Erica does
not imagine new worlds or create characters out of nothing, as some authors do.
Rather, she chooses to examine reality, at times contorting it to her liking.
This is a perilous yet inspiring decision because it forces an author to take
part in deep self-reflection, something Erica seems to know how to do. “You
have to write for yourself” she assured our class, “write about the thing you
feel a need to write about.”
"The
Loves Of Isadora." Time 105.5
(1975): 93. Academic Search Complete.
Web. 11 Apr. 2012.
No comments:
Post a Comment